Discounts on organic aromatherapy products including essential oils and more
Friday, March 30, 2007 2:05:09 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I don't want to be seen to be using my blog as another way of pimping out my client's services to my lovely readers -I'm really not, it's just that I've been so busy recently I've not had a chance to finalize some of the content that I'm going to upload shortly. In the mean time though, if you're into aromatherapy -or more to the point organic aromatherapy check out Florame organic aromatherapy's special offers on all sorts of great items.
Here's the email (there's no need to use a special offer code with this one)
Hello and thank you for signing up to receive our newsletters which are designed to inform you of new and exciting changes at Florame - including our first ever sale - our Spring Sale!
Our Spring Sale begins today (Friday 30 March 2007). There are over 30 organic items on sale with discounts ranging from 25% to 50% including:
However stocks are very limited and once they're gone, they're gone!
View all the items in our Spring Sale here
Don't forget, if you've got loyalty points you can use these to buy your bargains and remember you'll collect more points for every purchase you make.
All orders over £30 (exc VAT) receive free shipping.
All orders made before noon will be shipped the same day (except weekends, when they'll be shipped the following Monday).
We hope to welcome you to www.florame.co.uk soon and happy bargain hunting!
Threshers do it again -another 40% discount voucher! This time for Easter
Friday, March 23, 2007 12:00:23 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
As you're probably aware, at Christmas the Threshers Group put out a 40% discount voucher for the Threshers Group, well it would appear they’ve decided to do it again so I thought I should share it again, as before, the Threshers Group 40% Easter discount voucher can has a couple of T&Cs including no Champagne, Sparkling or Fortified Wine, other than that, it doesn’t appear to have the same £500 limit as before so drink up guys and girls!
Download the 40% Easter discount voucher for the Threshers Group
The voucher is valid until 1st April 2007
Remember: If you're looking for some naughty fun this Easter, check out the Miss Mays Adult Store for all sorts of adult toys and games
Simple accounting database
Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:27:16 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
As part of my mini-series on Business start-up advice I posted a simple accounting database (see: Finances (VAT, Accountants etc)) but today I realised I had just uploaded the mdb which won't be served by IIS so I just wanted to let you know I've uploaded it as a zip (incase you were one of the people that tried to download it).
Example Microsoft Access Accounting Database (21KB)
How to use Phil's error reporting code
Monday, March 19, 2007 7:34:20 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I’ve done a number of posts now on Phil Whinstanley’s error reporting class and this blog appears to be getting a lot of hits because of that which is pretty neat, as a result I’ve had a couple of people write to me asking similar questions about the code so I thought it would be an idea to write a little summary.
Where can I download the code?
It would appear that most of the old copies of Phil’s code have disappeared from the web, I’m not sure why so I’ve uploaded the versions I’ve got below. For convenience I have compiled the code into DLLs for those that don’t know/want to do this and I’ve also included the Visual Studio solutions. I’m not sure if these are based on the original codebase but I don’t think I’ve made any major alterations to these versions:
1 This is a version I was sent as his original including changes and example email was lost...
DLLs only:
If you have Visual Studio:
If you don’t have Visual Studio you can either download one of the above projects and delete the solution/project files or download the original WebException code. Ok, now you have the files :) -FWIW I can accept no responsibility for any of the files or the code, I just zipped them!
How to do I use the WebException class?
I’m now using a slightly modified version of the code to enable error reporting within AJAX (see: Reporting errors from AJAX using the WebException Class) which I’ll try and upload later but whichever version of the code you choose the use is pretty much the same.
Once you have referenced the DLL in your project (see: Importing/Referencing DLLs in Visual Studio) you will be able to use the WebException. As I’ve covered what you need to do to use the code from within an AJAX application in another post (see: Reporting errors from AJAX using the WebException Class) I’ll just cover how to use it to report global errors. To capture and respond to all application errors you will need to place this code within the global.asax, your project should automatically have one, if it doesn’t then you will need to add one.
Using the global.asax file, the first thing you need to do is add a reference to the DLL at the top of your code (this will allow you to call the methods and access the properties):
<%@ Import Namespace="ErrorReporting" %>
Next locate the Application_Error event handler, this is the method that handles all errors within the application (with exception of those thrown from within an AJAX application, read this post to report errors from within an AJAX application). Now replace your Application_Error and Application_PreRequestHandlerExecute handlers with (for more information on what I'm doing here see: ASP.Net WebException and Error Reporting useful code):
void Application_Error(
object sender,
EventArgs e)
{...}

{
bool reportErrors = Convert.ToBoolean(System.
Configuration.
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[
"SendErrors"]);

if (reportErrors)
{...}

{
Exception currentError = Server.GetLastError();
Deal with 404's
#region Deal with
404's
//Redirect the user to a friendly page
if(CheckForErrorType(currentError,
"FileNotFound"))

RedirectToFriendlyUrl(
"");

#endregion
Deal with Spambots
#region Deal with Spambots

if (CheckForErrorType(currentError,
"System.FormatException"))
{...}

{
if (
HttpContext.Current.Request.Form.Count >
0)
{...}

{
foreach (
string key
in HttpContext.Current.Request.Form)
{...}

{
if (key.IndexOf(
"_VIEWSTATE") >
0 &&
HttpContext.Current.Request.Form[key].ToString().IndexOf(
"Content-Type") >
0)
return;

}

}

}

#endregion
//Enable the trace for the duration of the error handling
TraceContext t =
HttpContext.Current.Trace;
bool bCurrentState = t.IsEnabled;

t.IsEnabled =
true;
Handle the Exception
#region Handle the
Exception

ErrorHandling.
WebException WE =
new ErrorHandling.
WebException();

WE.CurrentException = Server.GetLastError();

WE.MailFrom =
"you@yourdomain.com";

WE.MailTo =
"you@yourdomain.com";

WE.MailAdmin =
"you@yourdomain.com";

WE.Site =
"Your Site's Name or URL";

WE.SmtpServer =
"localhost";

WE.FloodCount =
10;

WE.FloodMins =
5;

#endregion
Choose what you're interested in
#region Choose what you
're interested in

WE.ReturnCache =
true;

WE.DrillDownInCache =
true;

WE.IncludeApplication =
true;

WE.IncludeBrowser =
true;

WE.IncludeEnvironmentVariables =
true;

WE.IncludeForm =
true;

WE.IncludeProcess =
true;

WE.IncludeQueryString =
true;

WE.IncludeRequestCookies =
true;

WE.IncludeRequestHeader =
true;

WE.IncludeResponseCookies =
true;

WE.IncludeServerVariables =
true;

WE.IncludeSession =
true;

WE.IncludeTrace =
true;

WE.IncludeVersions =
true;

WE.IncludeAuthentication =
true;

#endregion

WE.Handle();

//Return the trace to its original state
t.IsEnabled = bCurrentState;

//Redirect the user to a friendly page
RedirectToFriendlyUrl(
"");

}

}

protected void Application_PreRequestHandlerExecute(
Object sender,
EventArgs e)
{...}

{
if (Context.Handler
is IRequiresSessionState || Context.Handler
is IReadOnlySessionState)

ErrorReporting.
SessionTracker.AddRequest(
"Pre Request Handler Execute",
true,
true,
false);

}

private bool CheckForErrorType(
Exception ex,
string errorText)
{...}

{
if (ex !=
null)
{...}

{
//Check the exception
if (ex.GetType().ToString().IndexOf(errorText) >
0)
return true;
else
return CheckForErrorType(ex.InnerException, errorText);

}
else
{...}

}

private void RedirectToFriendlyUrl(
string Url)
{...}

{
if (!
String.IsNullOrEmpty(Url) && (Request.Url.Host.IndexOf(
"localhost") <
0))

Response.Redirect(Url);

}
This will create a new instance of the WebException object, assign the various properties accordingly (you will need to configure these) and then finally handle the error.
That’s it! That’s all you really need to do to have super error reporting instantly installed in your application! If that wasn't enough it's overloaded with a couple of filters for you :). I recommend you read one of my previous posts I’ve added which overviews a few simple tips and tricks when using the WebException class to that improves on its functionality (see: ASP.Net WebException and Error Reporting useful code).
All that's left to do is to test it works (see below).
What should I get from it?
That’s the million dollar question! Once the WebException class has been added to your application you should receive an email every time the application throws an error (which of course means you’ll never get an email from the system!)
View an example of the email you’ll get with all outputs set to true.
More tips/Warnings!
Ok so it’s installed and you’re getting no errors through (because your codes perfect) but there are a couple of other little tweaks I would make to the WebException class to make it a little more useable.
Create a centralised class for it
A while ago I posted a set of “useful” tips for reducing the number of spambot related emails, redirecting the user etc (see: ASP.Net WebException and Error Reporting useful code). That’s fine until you start including the WebException class into multiple projects, managing tweaks to the codebase gets a little cumbersome (i.e. adding the spambot check to all our projects that use the WebException meant a couple of hours of copying and pasting). The work around for me was to wrap it all up into a central static method (see: Reporting errors from AJAX using the WebException Class). I did this rather than fiddling with Phil’s WebException class itself incase he ever got around to releasing another version which would mean a bunch of changes etc.
Limit the page request log
If you have a site where every user is likely to have a high page visit count with most of the pages involving some form of form submission then it may be worth limiting the number of request’s stored as we have found that without limiting these we start receiving very large emails (some topping 10MB).
The reason this is happening is because the session tracker logs all the form elements for the request so if you had i.e. a CMS that submits a page of content every other page request all that data will be stored in the tracker, sticking with the idea of a CMS, your typical text word is around 10bytes (see: How many bytes for...), so say the user writes 500 words per page (which isn’t really a lot) that’s 4.9Kb per form submission plus on the re-display of the page you've got ViewState... That’s just the data submitted by the user, around that, you’ve got all the form fields, field names, session info, query string etc, see how it starts to add up?
The solution is fairly straight forward, what you need to do is alter SessionTracker.cs1:
1I thought I'd done this in a project already but cannot find the source so this may not work.
public class SessionTracker
{...}

{
public static void AddRequest(
string Comments,
bool DoForm,
bool DoQueryString,
bool DoCookies)
{...}

{

Request R =
new Request();

R.Time = DateTime.Now;

R.Comments = Comments;
if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current !=
null)
{...}

{

R.Path = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.Path.ToString();
if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.UrlReferrer !=
null)
{...}

{

R.Referrer = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.UrlReferrer.ToString();

}
if (DoForm)
{...}

{

R.Form = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.Form;

}
if (DoQueryString)
{...}

{

R.QueryString = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString;

}
if (DoCookies)
{...}

{

R.Cookies = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.Cookies;

}

}

if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] !=
null)
{...}

{

RequestCollection RC = ((RequestCollection)System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"]);

RC.Add(R);
if(RC.Count >
10)

RC.RemoveAt(
0);

System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] = RC;

}
else
{...}

{

RequestCollection RC =
new RequestCollection();

RC.Add(R);

System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] = RC;

}

}

public static void AddRequest(
string Comments)
{...}

{

Request R =
new Request();

R.Time = DateTime.Now;

R.Comments = Comments;
if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current !=
null)
{...}

{

R.Path = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.Path.ToString();
if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.UrlReferrer !=
null)
{...}

{

R.Referrer = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.UrlReferrer.ToString();

}

R.Form = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.Form;

R.QueryString = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString;

R.Cookies = System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Request.Cookies;

}

if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] !=
null)
{...}

{

RequestCollection RC = ((RequestCollection)System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"]);

RC.Add(R);
if (RC.Count >
10)

RC.RemoveAt(
0);

System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] = RC;

}
else
{...}

{

RequestCollection RC =
new RequestCollection();

RC.Add(R);

System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] = RC;

}

}

public static void AddRequest()
{...}

{

Request R =
new Request();

R.Time = DateTime.Now;
if (System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] ==
null)
{...}

{

RequestCollection RC = ((RequestCollection)System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"]);

RC.Add(R);
if (RC.Count >
10)

RC.RemoveAt(
0);

System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] = RC;

}
else
{...}

{

RequestCollection RC =
new RequestCollection();

RC.Add(R);

System.Web.
HttpContext.Current.Session[
"RequestCollection"] = RC;

}

}

public SessionTracker()
{...}

{

}

}
Outputting the Trace with the WebException Class
I know this is something I’ve posted about in the past but since moving to version 4 of the code and .Net 2.0 I was no longer getting the trace in my lovely error reports, after a little digging I’ve found a solution, in addition to the code that I posted earlier about enabling the trace using C#, the web.config needs to be set as follows:
<trace enabled="true" requestLimit="100" pageOutput="false" traceMode="SortByTime" localOnly="true" />
Storing the WebException code in App_Code Dir
If you use the WebException class in an ASP.Net 2.0 site, be careful you don’t do what we did and throw the site online uncompiled with a compilation error as it won’t get reported. Luckily I found this issue on a test site but it’s still worth noting.
Personally I wouldn’t put the error reporting code in the App_Code directory as this means you’ll end up needing to maintain a plethora of files throughout various projects. Instead compile a separate DLL and include that in your projects, then if like me you find a nice addition to the error reporting code you can easily update all sites to the latest version!
Setup a simple generic test page
Nothing fancy, just a button that throws an exception will do:
Happy Error Reporting :) -I'm hoping this is the last time I need to blog about this code but what's the betting another post is around the corner ;)
Payment on acounts
Friday, March 16, 2007 1:28:52 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I recently released a mini-series of articles with a load of great business start-up advice (also available to download as a PDF) in which I talk about how the government is really going the extra mile for SMEs at the moment, helping them out in a load of different ways -really trying to encourage entrepreneurship within the United Kingdom. This was something I believed until I got my tax bill.
The deadline for your self-assessment tax return is fast approaching and the government kindly sends you an invoice for your last tax return, mine arrived just before Christmas and to my surprise it was 50% more than I submitted. Seeing as I was off to Cornwall I decided I would deal with it on my return.
I've never had an issue with paying tax, in fact I've always been proud of the fact that I've needed to pay tax, my logic is simple: if I need to pay tax, it means I'm earning! The more tax I pay, the more I've earned. See my logic?
In the past, through claiming back expenses etc my tax bills have always been relatively small and although I seem to recall something called “Payment on account”, but it was IIRC an optional payment so next year the amount you have to pay is smaller. This is a good idea. As a small business owner I do put money aside for my tax bill but that’s always been 25% of each invoice. So what’s my issue?
To me, payment on account seems like a half-arsed attempt by the government to help self-employed people out, while getting a couple more quid in the process, the issue however is I feel they’ve focused more on taking more money than helping out the self-employed people. The idea is simple: You submit your tax bill for the previous tax year, they take an additional payment (payment on account) which will go towards the next tax year, this payment is estimated on their data for you -in this case your tax bill. The first payment is due with your current tax bill, the second in July of the current tax year. Thus splitting the next year’s tax bill into two more manageable payments. -Bollocks does it. Please excuse my French but this is not at all thought out and this is why:
I would consider myself to be one of the more sensible self-employed people when it comes to saving for tax, admittedly the first couple of years I was in business I paid the tax bill with a project we had on at the time but now I do put money aside for it with every invoice (now 50% of every invoice inc VAT goes aside). So come tax return time I have a nice chunk of cash to pay for my tax bill (always more than it needs to be because of expenses etc). I then follow the governments recommendation and fill out my self-assessment tax return online in plenty of time -a word of warning, I live with a chartered accountant who helps me out with this, it’s not something I just do on my own ;). In January I have the invoice for the bill and I pay it out of my savings, anything left I can use as I wish. All good so far! As far as the government is concerned I have followed what they’re recommending and that should be it. Payment on account however throws this into turmoil. What the government IMHO neglects to tell you is that you’re going to have to pay 50% more than you’re expecting in the first year you go over their threshold.
What I don’t like about that is they’re encouraging a lot of self-employed people to complete their own return online (best to do this with an accountant really) and save for their bill but by not telling you about this additional payment they can in theory put someone out of business over night -and there’s nothing you can do about it. Take the average self-employed business owner with a turnover of £50,000. Assuming no expenses you should expect to walk away with around £38,300 (using rough maths). Cool, so you’re good and put £11,700 into savings in preparation and use the rest to pay the bills, buy a holiday, a car etc.
You think all’s dandy until at the end of the year you get a tax bill for £17,550 with a further payment of £5,850 being required in July. That leaves you with £26,600 remaining rather than the initial £38,300 you were expecting. Why? That’s simple -payment on account, the tax office say "Well, you earned £50,000 this year, so you’ll do that next year so we’ll take that money from you now, that way next year you’ll already have some money on account -helping you out. Don’t worry though, if your tax bill for next year is lower, we’ll refund the money." -there are so many issues to this statement but I’ll come back to those.
I've made a graph demonstrating the two differences. The light red segment is the amount you will need to pay in the July following your January tax payment, the dark red section must be paid in addition to your main tax bill.
Take my industry -the IT industry. It’s not unknown (or an infrequent occurrence) to have a large project (i.e. £100,000) which you can complete within a financial year. If you're already working in the sector and this £100,000 contract is your reason for going it alone this could be a serious issue for you. Ignoring how you take this money, by the end of a single fiscal year you take £100,000:
- Turnover:£100,000
- Tax Allowance:£5,000
- Taxable Income:£95,000
- Tax at 22%:£7,700
- Tax at 40%:£24,000
- Expected Tax Bill:£31,700
- Expected to you:£68,300
In the event you’ve taken £100,000 for a project you’re likely to spend a fair amount of that on things like credit cards, niceties after having gone without for a while etc, so you spend a fair whack, perhaps put a chunk on your mortgage, buy a house or invest a fair chunk. Say you get the payment a couple of months before the tax year ends so you take the time off and relax a little, basically using a fair amount of the money, but you’re ok as you’ve put £32,000 into savings in preparation for your tax bill. When it comes to filing time however you’re told that you owe them an additional £15,850 with your current tax bill followed by another payment of £15,850 in July. Starting to see where my issue lies?
If you didn’t spend anymore of that £68,300 than you absolutely had to and some how had the additional £31,700 available you’re fine, but what if you decided to treat someone special, or invest the money where it’s not readily accessible, what can you do? I called the tax office to talk it through with them as I didn’t want to pay this payment on account as it would mean that things would be a little tight until the end of a current system development. The representative had absolutely no concern or understanding for my situation, when I asked her if I could spread the payments a little I was told that interest would be charged on the money if I didn’t pay it and a fine would be incurred. Furthermore she told me that this payment on account was ok because it was tax on money we had already earned (the payment on account is in theory for the current fiscal year), I did think about pointing out that a business’ earnings are not the same as a worker’s salary as they are frequently sporadic and go through highs and lows -in the case of The Site Doctor, the majority of our year’s income comes in during the final fiscal quarter.
There were a couple of things I didn’t like about the representatives statement/government’s perceived understanding of the situation:
- Great they are trying to help you out with your business -hopefully making the next tax year’s tax bill a smaller payment (or not at all if you think about the logic) but how does making it a forced payment without making it very well known about help?
- It assumes that your business’ monthly turnover is the same as an employee in that your entire year’s earnings are the same (or similar) each month with no seasonal fluctuations. I know there are some more established businesses which do have a regular income but The Site Doctor certainly doesn’t. As already mentioned, The Site Doctor has the majority of the year’s earnings paid in the final fiscal quarter -after you have to pay your tax bill!
- They say they’ll refund the money if your next bill is lower than the last so it’s ok. But taking the example of the £50,000 turnover above, that’s a years worth of interest on £11,700 you’ve just lost potential interest of £936 or £2,536 in the example of our £100,000 contract. Can you afford to loose out on that?
- This can in theory put someone out of business, as it happened, I had to pay this bill mid contract when normally I wouldn’t have had any money for a fair while, to make things worse Stacey was having a short sabbatical. Luckily we had the money in savings but if we didn’t we would have without a doubt found it hard to pay.
The solution?
I don’t like bitching and moaning about things without having some form of solution and I can understand that the government wants to get this cash into the bank and after the first year or two it makes things better for them but for goodness sake make the payment optional, perhaps offer a monthly payment option without penalties or at least inform people about this so they can make provisions for it. Had I not found this out before this tax year I would be in serious trouble. Of course, having a tax specialist do your books should have highlighted this for you -and it goes to show that just because they’re an accountant, if they’re not a specialist they may not know about something that can break the bank (I’ve got no blame for Stacey before you wonder!).
Note: These figures are derived from my own experience so please take professional advice on the matter as for all I know, there may be a sliding scale (I would hope there is) otherwise the government is killing businesses left right and centre. I’d be interested to know if anyone else knew of/has experienced this issue.
When customer service goes mad
Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:09:43 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I rate good/great customer service very highly when it comes to retaining clients and obtaining new clients so it always make me laugh at how some companies value their customer service and more to the point wonder how they’re still in business!
The other day I had a couple of conversations with Fasthosts that I simply had to share. A little background though –we’ve been with Fasthosts for a couple of years now, I think we originally signed up in 1999 through 4as1 and I know we were one of their first customers. Since then we’ve registered around 300 domains with their sister company UKReg without a problem.
More recently however I’ve been feeling less easy about their service. Firstly they started charging for things left right and centre –ok, they’ve got a business to run, next they started to overload the servers (ok it’s a shared server, I can live with that), to combat the overloaded servers they started moving domains –I’m guessing higher demand sites onto their own boxes. That was ok, except they gave you no advanced warning and seeing as a fair few of the sites in question would reference MS Access databases elsewhere would cause us no-end of update fun.
Then their support went down hill to the extent that we often had to wait for ages until the phone was answered (listening to “you are 17th in the queue”). At this point we had just opened an account with Rackspace so had the view to slowly move the domains over. That was until I got an email saying they would now be charging for a number of services that were historically free which cut into our margins –making them negative. That annoyed me somewhat so moving the sites away from Fasthosts was moved up my priority list.
When we first signed up with Fasthosts they were the dogs, cheap hosting with all the bells and whistles –we had a Windows account which meant –unlike others at the time we had free use of ASP and all sorts but now all they seem interested in is the Yankee dollar rather than customer retention.
The other day was the straw that broke the camels back in regards my tolerance of Fasthosts. I had two fairly simple questions and it wasn’t easy to get a straight response to either. The first related to a domain I was adding for a client, they don’t use it but have access to a personal control panel which allows them to manage their emails etc. The control panel although a little outdated does the job. The catch however is recently you need to pay for use of Fasthosts’ control panel or you can build your own through the API. I didn’t need half the stuff included in the “Standard Bundle” and only wanted Fasthosts’ personal control panel so thought it would be best to ask which package I needed:
Conversation 1 – Fasthosts Personal Control Panels
Massively long delay before a response finally comes
Great! They’ve removed the control panels I highlighed (and only those ones!) but they were just the ones in the next month! In fairness, after a few more emails I did get the past invoices refunded as well as a fair few future ones taken off the account but it makes me very concerned as to who else is still paying this charge... I would never have questioned it as they did send a mailshot out saying they would now be charging for them etc. Most odd
Conversation 2 – SQL Server Express
As I’ve already mentioned, we’ve been with Fasthosts for around 8 years now (that’s at least £7k in the basic fees in case you’re interested) and for most of that we’ve had use of a shared SQL Server. When we signed up it was SQL Server 7 and although we’ve requested it nicely we’ve never been upgraded and so it resides on a very outdated machine to which we cannot connect using the new SQL Management studio.
This shared SQL Server costs us £35pm and as we’ve only got 3 active clients using it, bringing in a total of £300pa I felt that is a slight waste of money so my plan was to use SQL Server Express in place (they’re relatively low traffic sites and MS Access was out of the question as they made use of various stored procedures).
As you now have to pay extra for an ASP.Net account I thought I’d ask support to find out what the situation was...
I felt that was direct and straight to the point, not asking anything too complicated to which one may expect a yes/no answer? Right?...
Ok, I know sometimes I’m a little slow but “appropriate authentication method” that had me seriously confused, the only thing I could think was he was referring to Management Studio. Not only that I know for a fact that we’re on SQL Server 7…
Ok, so perhaps my question wasn't clear enough, I thought that's what I asked, I thought (clearly incorrectly) that SQL Server Express was now released as a standard update through Microsoft updates -so they've disabled that. Perhaps I should have been a little clear in pointing out the fact that I HAVE a shared SQL Server account with them and that it was unsatisfactory but hey I thought they'd check what services we already had with them.
Ok, so as this point you can tell I was slowly quickly loosing grip but this next one just finishes me off...
Feel like you’re on a roundabout? I gave up and spent the weekend fast-forwarding my server transfer schedule.
Ok, looking at those few emails perhaps it is a bit extreme to close down our account with them but this is a monthly occurrence, I would say all in all this set of emails took around 2 hours of my day which to me is time I could be billing a client so I think it’s justified.
As it happens they did me a favour, by forcing my hand (or annoying me to the extent I did something about it) we're now finally on Rackspace and our sites are a lot more speedy :) Happy Days!
Give your site a pulse
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:45:25 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Get your finger on the pulse of your site with this great new (free) RSS statistics service “PulseRSS”. I met the developers of PulseRSS the other day at my first Multipack meet (West Midlands based new media meet) which, if you’re nearby you should check out in the future as they’re a lovely bunch of guys (and girls apparently but they were no-where to be seen on Saturday).
Back to PulseRSS! As already mentioned, PulseRSS is a statistics service via an RSS/XML feed that works in a very similar way to Google Analytics but unlike Google Analytics, they’ve followed the principle of KISS which I think works really well, the interface is simple and easy to use and have I already mentioned it was free?
So if you’re looking for a simple free statistics package then check out PulseRSS –I’ve got it running on my blog already so it’ll be interesting to see how the stats compare to Google Analytics...

ASP not running on Windows 2003 with ASP.Net installed
Monday, March 12, 2007 10:49:09 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Another post from Doug Setzer from 27Seconds.com :)
At my "day job", the systems guys are building new Windows 2003 servers to upgrade our aging Windows 2000 servers. The plan is to:
- Build the new Windows 2003 server
- Install IIS
- Install .NET
- Run the IIS migration tool from the old Win2k server
That all went as well as could go - little things got mixed up and had to be corrected. But, the server would let you request plain HTML files and ASPX files, but classic ASP pages were returned blank. In poking around Google and the server, we came to find that we had to enable ASP content via:
- IIS Manager
- Web Services Extensions
- Specifically allow Active Server Pages
But, we were still having the same issues. Stopping and restarting IIS didn't help. Nor did a server reboot.
I found a blog post that mentioned checking that the ASP ISAPI has the correct path. It tried a random thought that Microsoft has changed the default name of the "Windows"/"Winnt" folder -- Windows NT4, 2000, etc. all use "Winnt", where as Windows 2003 uses the "Windows" folder. Sure enough, double checking the path to the ASP ISAPI had the wrong path and fixing this path fixed our issues with classic ASP files.